Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Gaita on love

Notes from a life of the mind
by
January-February 2024, no. 461

Justice and Hope: Essays, lectures and other writings by Raimond Gaita

Melbourne University Publishing, $65 hb, 599 pp

Gaita on love

Notes from a life of the mind
by
January-February 2024, no. 461

For a man many would regard as the very epitome of the type, Raimond Gaita seems rather hostile to the concept of the intellectual. It is ‘irredeemably mediocre’, he explains, inferior to the kinds of moral and political responsibility that attach to teacher or politician. Intellectuals are active in the public domain, grappling with ideas, culture, and politics, but they have often lacked independence of mind, he says, ‘because they never had it or because they sacrificed it to the cause’.

When Gaita articulates his ideal of a university, the vision is of ‘a community of scholars’, of a contemplative life that requires ‘inwardness with values slowly apprehended by living the life of the mind in community with fine exemplars of it’. In that sense, he believes, the university is finished. And while some academics might take time out of their teaching and research to become public intellectuals, it is not an obligation.

Yet Gaita would seem to many the archetype of the Australian academic as intellectual, one of a fairly small number of humanities scholars in this country who have left a significant imprint on the culture. He is best known as the author of a much-admired memoir of his childhood as the son of European migrants, Romulus, My Father (1998), later a film, but here he is essayist, reviewer, and lecturer. The pieces range from the short, sharp reflection on a current event, such as ‘Why the War Is Wrong’ (2003) on Iraq, through to extended reflection of a more challenging – and perhaps ‘academic’ – kind, such as that on whether torture can be a lesser evil.

Justice and Hope: Essays, lectures and other writings

Justice and Hope: Essays, lectures and other writings

by Raimond Gaita

Melbourne University Publishing, $65 hb, 599 pp

Comments (3)

  • I have had the good fortune to read a recent essay from Noam Chomsky in which he not so much disowns the 1967 essay but certainly makes significant updates to his perspective. It would of course be bizarre if he didn't after the passage of nearly 60 years. It appears in 'Illegitimate Authority Facing the Challenges of Our Time' by Chomsky.
    Posted by Patrick Hockey
    17 April 2024
  • Dear Frank, I think what Raimond Gaita has in mind could better be described as honour, respect, and compassion, rather than love.

    Love is a word that is much abused and misused, perhaps due to emotion, perhaps because it is misunderstood.

    The essence of love is placing the well-being of another above all else irrespective of the cost to oneself and without the slightest expectation of anything in return.

    As for Socrates, Plato cites in extenso in his “Symposium” the long dialogue Socrates is reported to have had with the prophetess Diotima, in which she declares that “love is of immortality”.

    Like our involuntary body functions of heartbeat, breathing, etc., our involuntary mental functions of morality, altruism, and love are all cogs that keep the wheel of life turning.
    Posted by Rodney Crisp
    22 January 2024
  • One of the most disappointing documents I have had the opportunity to read is Noam Chomsky's, 'The Responsibility of Intellectuals' from 1967. It starts badly when NC claims that intellectuals, "are in a position to expose the lies of governments... etc". In other words, the same old tired idea that the world's troubles are attributable to the actions of bad players or wicked individuals. It doesn't improve after that.

    Nevertheless, too often today, nearly 60 years later, what passes for intellectual thought in this country becomes instead the same unhelpful scolding and tut-tutting about our perceived shortcomings. It's not getting us anywhere.

    I am more sympathetic to Chomsky's more recent thoughts, that in order for an individual to advance through academia they must to a certain extent not rock the boat or aggravate their betters. So that as a structure within society that we might look to for new ideas, academia is in fact largely a collective of conformists.
    Posted by Patrick Hockey
    04 January 2024

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.