Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Deeds That Didn’t Win the Empire

by
August 2001, no. 233

Stoker’s Submarine by by Fred and Elizabeth Brenchley

HarperCollins, $29.95 pb, 264pp

Deeds That Didn’t Win the Empire

by
August 2001, no. 233

I remember reading a book entitled Deeds That Won the Empire at primary school. Mainly, it seemed to be about the slaughter of various groups of native races by the superior technology and organisation of the West, always personified by focusing on an intrepid leader called Carstairs or Hethington-Bloggs, or some such name. Even in the 1950s, the book had a desperately old-fashioned feel to it. This type of writing, one felt, could not last.

But it has. There is an ever-increasing volume of books that add up to not much more than that book I read so long ago. Historians need to contemplate this issue. Why is it that when the industrial and de-personalised nature of modern war has never been more apparent, publishers are issuing books that attempt to reverse this picture and to concentrate on what for want of a better word I will call ‘deeds’?

Stoker’s Submarine

Stoker’s Submarine

by by Fred and Elizabeth Brenchley

HarperCollins, $29.95 pb, 264pp

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.