Raimond Gaita reviews 'The President of Good & Evil: The ethics of George W. Bush' by Peter Singer

Raimond Gaita reviews 'The President of Good & Evil: The ethics of George W. Bush' by Peter Singer

The President of Good & Evil: The ethics of George W. Bush

by Peter Singer

Text Publishing, $30 pb, 303 pp, 1920885080

On the face of it, this book represents a strange project: to elaborate for the reader’s consideration the moral beliefs of a man whom the author judges (and judged in advance, one suspects) to be shallow, inconsistent, lacking moral and intellectual sobriety, and to have failed so often to act on the moral principles he repeatedly professes that he can fairly be accused of hypocrisy. What interest can there be in detailing that over 303 pages? The answer, of course, is that the man in question is George W. Bush – ‘the president of good and evil’, as he is described in the book’s title , because ‘good’ and ‘evil’ are the terms to which he is repeatedly drawn when he moralises about national and international issues.

It comes as no surprise that Singer judges Bush’s ethics to be ‘woefully inadequate’ and the man to be the same. Even so, this book reminds those who already believed it, and it should compel those who don’t, to acknowledge that the reasons for believing it are powerful. Singer makes his case more persuasive by including, unusually for a philosopher, extensive empirical research on matters that range from Bush’s tax policies to the invasion of Iraq. When I finished the book, I was again frightened by the awful meaning of the fact that Bush is the president of the most powerful nation on earth, again anxious about those aspects of America that make that possible and overwhelmed by a sense of the complexity of that extraordinary nation. Singer’s highly qualified acknowledgment that the news is not all bad because Bush has done more about Aids in Africa than his predecessor didn’t diminish any of those responses. Nor, I think, does Singer believe that it comes to much. Disdain for Bush, for his kind of morality and religion, is evident in many passages in what would otherwise seem to be a book striking for its touchingly earnest attempt to take Bush’s beliefs seriously.

Read the rest of this article by subscribing to ABR Online for as little as $10 a month.

We offer a range of subscription options, including print, which can be found by clicking here. If you are already a subscriber, enter your username and password in the ‘Log In’ section in the top right-hand corner of the screen.

If you require assistance, contact us or consult the Frequently Asked Questions page.

More in this issue

Leave a comment

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.

NB: If you are an ABR Online subscriber or contributor, you will need to login to ABR Online in order to post a comment. If you have forgotten your login details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to comments@australianbookreview.com.au. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.