Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Lincoln by Thomas Keneally

May 2003, no. 251

Lincoln by Thomas Keneally

Weidenfeld & Nicolson, $35 hb, 202 pp

Lincoln by Thomas Keneally

May 2003, no. 251

Weidenfeld & Nicolson were both wise and fortunate in their choice of Thomas Keneally to write a study of Abraham Lincoln for their Lives series. He in turn gifted them, and us, with a story that listens closely to Lincoln’s words and sees some shape in the internal and external demons that so often troubled his life. Keneally’s narrative moves quietly alongside the Illinois rail-splitter as Lincoln transforms himself from local small-time politician to President of the USA.

Keneally’s book is a short one: about 60,000 words, no footnotes, eight pages of ‘Sources’. As a compact volume, it might be perceived to be ‘potted Lincoln’, a quick read for a general audience. This is not accurate. Keneally has found a path in writing about Lincoln that has eluded numerous others. Many contributors to the vast library of Lincolniana have agreed that Lincoln transformed himself into the man who won the presidency in 1860 and then, reluctantly resupplying Union forces at Fort Sumter in April of 1861, turned the threat of secession into reality. He issued the proclamation freeing the slaves of the South and won re-election in 1864. But the same writers have often diminished Lincoln’s agency in making his career by invoking destiny. Subtly, they have given an undue explanatory force to Destiny or Tragedy. There is Carl Sandburg’s lonely country boy, his prairie language, his being earthed in both the pro-slavery of southern Illinois and the anti-slavery of the state’s north. Sandburg’s already doomed Lincoln: crossing the state talkin’ up slavery and talkin’ it down.

Donna Merwick reviews 'Lincoln' by Thomas Keneally


by Thomas Keneally

Weidenfeld & Nicolson, $35 hb, 202 pp

From the New Issue

You May Also Like

Comment (1)

  • Last month, Thomas Keneally, in an interview in the Guardian, said that he experienced 'Schadenfreude' when Melbourne went into lockdown, because of the number of Covid cases there in 2020. He also gratuitously referred to Melbourne as 'Bleak City'. From those comments, how is anyone able to take Keneally's writing or his opinions seriously?
    Posted by Peter Kay
    27 August 2021

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.