Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Reporting Back

by
October 1990, no. 125

Reporting Back

by
October 1990, no. 125

The Australian Bicentennial Arts Program has been documented in a collection of review articles recently published by Mead and Beckett. It is a record not only of the wide range of arts activities throughout the year but also of some of the issues which confronted the artists involved.

No, it is not an Aborigine on the front of the Australian Bicentennial Authority’s 1988 Reviews (edited by Sarah Overton). It is Mamadou Dioume as Bhima in Brook’s Mahabharata. And don’t be misled by the Aboriginal colours in a contemporary-primitive motif that hovers in the foreground about the title. The essential problem is, evidently, to appear respectable while affirming a vanquished culture (is there a preferable word?) within an imperial medium.

Acknowledging their images, we already appropriate, pervert and destroy them. They themselves should have a right, you would think, to leap up and complain, to seek to aggravate what Charles Osborne (an Englishman) describes as ‘white Australians’ irrational guilt’. But, if ignored altogether, then they cry out the louder. Hence the black man beneath the emblem, re­calling a delicately, perhaps affectionately effaced Aboriginal presence even while disavowing prejudice.

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.