Melbourne International Chamber Music Competition

ABR Arts is generously supported by ABR Patrons and Copyright Agency Cultural Fund.
Sheila Fitzpatrick Monday, 23 July 2018
Published in ABR Arts

I don’t watch the World Cup or even Wimbledon, so I may have some Australian gene missing. But by the time the string quartet winners were announced at the end of the Melbourne International Chamber Music Competition last week, I had become a fan, almost a barracker. I was rooting for the Eliot Quartet, whose Beethoven Opus 132 A minor quartet in the finals was extraordinary. When they came in second to the Goldmund Quartet (who were fine but never produced a sound as wonderful as that of Eliot’s first violin, Maryana Osipova), I was first indignant and then downcast that they didn’t pick my guys. That is not a reproach to the excellent jury led by Wilma Smith, but a comment on the oddness of chamber music as a spectator sport. The whole point of going to a football match is to be a partisan and shout out in joy or disappointment at the result. It’s the same with the MICMC, held every four years since 1991 as a competition for the best string quartets and piano trios of all nationalities whose members are under the age of thirty-five, and this year for the first time produced by Musica Viva. The difference with chamber music is that you probably don’t go in as a fan of a particular group, but rather become one in the course of the competition as it moves from heats to semi-finals to finals.

Going to a concert to hear a string quartet is an odd activity at the best of times. Chamber music was traditionally written to be played at home with friends, a conversation with each other rather than a performance for strangers; and the string quartet is the epitome of the intimate genre. (Jeffrey Tate once remarked: ‘The most perfect expression of human behaviour is a string quartet.’) So what is it doing in the concert hall? Can the quartet players still be talking to each other, once they are communicating with an audience as well? Are performance flourishes, like the dramatically raised bows at the end of a piece that have recently become popular with younger groups (including a few of the MICMC entrants), appropriate for the genre? Writing in The Australian of 9 July, Eamonn Kelly bemoaned the ‘onset of competition mode, whereby groups trade sincerity for showmanship’. I wouldn’t go that far, at least not about raised bows. Still, it’s hard to imagine an amateur quartet playing for the love of it at home ending with such a bravura flourish, and not just because when you’re playing in someone’s living room there usually isn’t enough space.

Sign up to the fortnightly ABR Arts e-bulletin for news, reviews, and giveaways

Read the rest of this article by subscribing to ABR Online for as little as $10 a month.

We offer a range of subscription options, including print, which can be found by clicking here. If you are already a subscriber, enter your username and password in the ‘Log In’ section in the top right-hand corner of the screen.

If you require assistance, contact us or consult the Frequently Asked Questions page.

Published in ABR Arts
Sheila Fitzpatrick

Sheila Fitzpatrick

Sheila Fitzpatrick is the author of three memoirs, My Father’s Daughter, A Spy in the Archives, and, most recently, Mishka’s War: A European Odyssey of the 1940s (2017). On Stalin’s Team: the Years of Living Dangerously in Soviet Politics, was published in 2015. She is a Professor at the University of Sydney.

Leave a comment

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.

NB: If you are an ABR Online subscriber or contributor, you will need to login to ABR Online in order to post a comment. If you have forgotten your login details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.