Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Much Ado About Nothing (Bell Shakespeare) ★★

ABR Arts 19 July 2019

Much Ado About Nothing (Bell Shakespeare) ★★

ABR Arts 19 July 2019

There is much conjecture around the concept of Shakespeare’s ‘problem plays’; critics disagree not only on the strict meaning of the term – F.S. Boas saw them as works that used a protagonist’s dramatic situation to illustrate a social problem, while Ernest Schanzer insists they turn on an ethical dilemma – but also on the actual list of plays that fit the description. Traditionally, the problem plays are All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, and Troilus and Cressida, although The Merchant of Venice is sometimes included. What clearly links those works is an ambivalence of tone, a resistance to the parameters of genre. Of course, if that were the only qualification, we would have to include The Winter’s Tale and even Antony and Cleopatra.

A play that is almost never mentioned in this discussion, but one that should be, is Much Ado About Nothing (1598). Audiences tend to see this work as one of the Bard’s sunniest, something Kenneth Branagh’s 1993 film version, with its terracotta-lit Tuscan setting, makes explicit. But it has a canker in the bud that has become increasingly difficult to ignore. When the young lover at the centre of the tale is tricked into believing his fiancée is cheating on him, he viciously and publicly shames her at the church, and then remains utterly unmoved by her reported death. The effect is more sunburnt than sunny, and the sting of sexual prejudice and male entitlement remains on the skin no matter how much honey is poured into the play’s conclusion. Contemporary performances of this work turn on the director’s handling of this incident. Ignoring it simply won’t do, but giving it free rein brings its own problems.

Duncan Ragg as Benedick and Zindzi Okenyo as Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing (photograph by Clare Hawley)Duncan Ragg as Benedick and Zindzi Okenyo as Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing (photograph by Clare Hawley)

Director James Evans certainly doesn’t ignore it; if anything, his production for Bell Shakespeare tilts so thoroughly towards the misogyny and subsumed male violence that he chokes all the joy out of the rest of the play. Audiences will always associate this work with the characters of Beatrice (Zindzi Okenyo) and Benedick (Duncan Ragg), true lovers who like to pretend to themselves and the world that they hate each other. Technically, their protracted courtship and immense war of wits is the play’s subplot; it’s the aborted and hastily remounted marriage of Claudio (Will McDonald) and Hero (Vivienne Awosoga) that takes up the two hours’ traffic of this stage.

Evans decides to open his production with the conclusion, as a chastened Claudio accepts an unknown replacement bride who turns out to be Hero – the play is full of masks and reveals, of mistaken intentions and eavesdropped conversations – but it is difficult to see what he hoped to achieve with this. It means that the opening note is a lugubrious and leaden one, from which the production never fully recovers. There is little opportunity to warm to the returning soldiers at all, given that Danny Ball plays the courtly Don Pedro as a smarmy, pouting egotist and McDonald makes Claudio seem little more than a pampered pretty boy. Only Ragg’s Benedick has any charm, and thankfully he has it in spades. Toning down the character’s tendency to braggadocio, he uses his reluctance as a buffer against his friends’ self-satisfied locker-room banter. When the men turn on Hero, this Benedick grows instantly in moral stature, a man apart. It’s a lovely portrait of doubt that morphs into wisdom and integrity.

Mandy Bishop as Dogberry and Zindzi Okenyo as Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing (photograph by Clare Hawley)Mandy Bishop as Dogberry and Zindzi Okenyo as Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing (photograph by Clare Hawley)

If Evans thought to elevate or champion the women by undermining the men, the experiment largely fails. Okenyo has plenty of spunk and weariness, but little of the verve and luminosity of which Beatrice is capable. We get a strong sense of her disgust with the men who treat Hero so abominably, but almost none of the joy and energy she draws from her war of words with Benedick. Awosoga invests Hero with spunk of her own, and she delivers a fantastic slap across Claudio’s face near the end, but it’s a thankless and colourless role for the majority of the running time. Best is Mandy Bishop as the usually tedious Dogberry, her malapropisms employed as a base note for some very silly but welcome clowning.

Pip Runciman’s set and costumes – with their faintly subtropical colours and garish dark-green plant motifs – suggest long hot nights in Miami rather than the sun-kissed streets of Messina, which would be fine if anything were made of it. The playing space is both ugly and impractical, which Bell Shakespeare seems to think is a necessary evil in their touring productions (Evans’s previous production for this company was the disastrous Julius Caesar, which was even uglier than this). Perhaps the touring productions shouldn’t play in the major cities, or should at least play in smaller and quirkier venues; there is something shoddy about the aesthetic here that seriously damages the company’s brand.

BellShakespeare MuchAdoAboutNothing c Clare Hawley 3The cast of Much Ado About Nothing (photograph by Clare Hawley) 

Sadly, this Much Ado About Nothing is stingy not just aesthetically but emotionally. It tries to sound a note of hope at the end, but its overarching vision is one of hatred and suspicion between the genders, the kind that a couple of weddings are unable to disguise. This is a problem all right, the same problem directors had with The Taming of the Shrew back in the 1990s, when contemporary mores resulted in productions that were unremittingly depressing and mean-spirited. Nobody wanted to see them, and that play’s popularity has waned for now. Perhaps Much Ado will be retired too, in due course, to rise again from the ashes of our current gender wars. Let’s hope it has a happier resurrection than this.

Much Ado About Nothing, in its première season, is being performed at the Fairfax Studio, Arts Centre Melbourne, from 17 to 27 July 2019. The production will then tour nationally. Performance attended: July 18

You May Also Like

Comments (3)

  • Saw the production last night. I agree with every word of Tim Byrne's review. I actually came online hunting for reviews as I was so appalled by most elements of this production. As a teacher of English and Drama, I sat there so glad that I hadn't taken my students to see this as an example of contemporary Shakespeare or as an example of acting and direction. Always good to read a review that more succinctly articulates what I am feeling.
    Posted by Edwina
    25 July 2019
  • "That play’s popularity has waned for now. Perhaps Much Ado will be retired too, in due course, to rise again from the ashes of our current gender wars." This is a strange, vague comment. What exactly is the reviewer calling for here? I love Shakespeare, but many of his plays have misogynistic elements, and some are entirely built on misogyny. When producing his work, contemporary productions have the responsibility to acknowledge and interrogate this. Yes, this process might change or 'break' plays (so what?). I think that's what makes theatre exciting and vital. To direct Shakespeare without criticising him is to betray him. I haven't seen this production, and have no idea whether it's successful. But the 'gender wars' aren't a 'trend'. You're never going to get your old production of Shrew again. Maybe next time the reviewer should speak to a few women in the foyer after the show and get their take.
    Posted by A.C.
    23 July 2019
  • Dear Tim,
    As I read your review, I am left wondering if this was the same production that I saw yesterday afternoon. (It was BTW). While not totally perfect, there was so much more to admire about the play than you indicate in your review. The whole slant on locker-room bro culture contrasted perfectly with Beatrice’s beautifully acted frustration about being a woman... so pertinent even in today’s society! This contrasted with the relationship of Claudio and Hero, which made way more sense to me than the Branagh version. It really resonated with me and my friend (both females). I was also a little nonplussed by the opening scene, however, when that scene returned at the end it made total sense, giving the production a very rounded feeling. I love how there is flexibility in the dramaturgy of Shakespeare plays. Every time there is a new angle, and Bell Shakespeare have often used this to great advantage. Especially in their poignant Richard III two years ago.
    I urge you to attend the performance again, with some friends, and see if you all agree with your first analysis.
    Posted by Robyn St George
    22 July 2019

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.