The Best Australian Science Writing 2017 edited by Michael Slezak

Reviewed by
March 2018, no. 399
Rachael Mead reviews 'The Best Australian Science Writing 2017' edited by Michael Slezak

The Best Australian Science Writing 2017

edited by Michael Slezak

NewSouth, $29.99 pb, 291 pp, 9781742235554

The Best Australian Science Writing 2017 edited by Michael Slezak

Reviewed by
March 2018, no. 399

It is a common misconception that scientists are not writers. As Professor Emma Johnston states in her foreword, writing is a fundamental part of the scientific process and innumerable volumes of scientific journals are published each year. These papers often employ dry, opaque language decipherable only by other scientists, so science journalists wade through these volumes, distilling and translating the latest, most exciting science into language that is accessible and appealing to non-specialist readers. Recent financial cuts to newsrooms have triggered the shedding of subject-specific writers, including science journalists. As a result, the quality and quantity of informed science journalism in Australia has been in decline, despite the dire need for public engagement with scientific ideas and policy. In this context, anthologies such as this are especially significant.

Rachael Mead reviews 'The Best Australian Science Writing 2017' edited by Michael Slezak

The Best Australian Science Writing 2017

edited by Michael Slezak

NewSouth, $29.99 pb, 291 pp, 9781742235554

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.

NB: If you are an ABR Online subscriber or contributor, you will need to login to ABR Online in order to post a comment. If you have forgotten your login details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.