David McInnis reviews 'The One King Lear' by Brian Vickers

David McInnis reviews 'The One King Lear' by Brian Vickers

The One King Lear

by Brian Vickers

Harvard University Press (Footprint) $84 hb, 408 pp, 9780674504844

Shakespeare's King Lear exists in two significantly different versions, the quarto (Q) published in 1608 and the folio (F) of 1623. Scholars typically believe that the play was altered for performances after its first printing. Possibly this took place around 1610, when the King's Men were interested enough in the legendary history of Britain to perform Cymbeline. The folio text was the seeming product of these revisions.

Distinctive features of Q include a more elaborate mock trial; the pathos of servants helping the blinded Gloucester; and a more substantial denunciation of Goneril by Albany. By contrast, Albany is systematically demonised in F (including having his final speech reassigned to Edgar); F has the Fool's famous prophecy; and F consistently politicises the action in a way not found in Q. The Folio text justifies Lear's decision to divide the kingdom between the dukes ('while we / Unburthen'd crawle toward death') somewhat more than Q, and it amplifies the uncomfortable exchange of 'nothings' between Lear and Cordelia. Perhaps most interestingly, Lear dies differently in Q and F. He has a moment of delusion in F ('Do you see this? Looke on her? Looke her lips, / Looke there, looke there ...') before dying, causing Kent so much pain that he wishes his own heart would break. In the quarto, Lear wills his own heart to break, and then expires.

Read the rest of this article by subscribing to ABR Online for as little as $10 a month.

We offer a range of subscription options, including print, which can be found by clicking here. If you are already a subscriber, enter your username and password in the ‘Log In’ section in the top right-hand corner of the screen.

If you require assistance, contact us or consult the Frequently Asked Questions page.

Published in October 2016, no. 385
David McInnis

David McInnis

David McInnis is a Senior Lecturer in Shakespeare Studies at the University of Melbourne. In 2016 he was jointly awarded the Australian Academy of the Humanities' Max Crawford Medal (granted to Australian early-career researchers for outstanding scholarly achievement in the humanities). He is the author of Mind-Travelling and Voyage Drama in Early Modern England (Palgrave, 2013), co-editor of Lost Plays in Shakespeare's England (Palgrave, 2014; co-edited with Matthew Steggle), and is currently editing Dekker's Old Fortunatus for the Revels Plays series. With Roslyn L. Knutson, he is founder and co-editor of the Lost Plays Database.

Leave a comment

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.

NB: If you are an ABR Online subscriber or contributor, you will need to login to ABR Online in order to post a comment. If you have forgotten your login details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to comments@australianbookreview.com.au. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.