The Ghost of Waterloo by Robin Adair

Reviewed by
April 2011, no. 330

The Ghost of Waterloo by Robin Adair

Reviewed by
April 2011, no. 330

In the afterword to The Ghost of Waterloo, Robin Adair reveals what attracts him to writing historical fiction: ‘This has been a work of what I call “friction” – facts and real people rubbing along with plausible “what-ifs”.’ The term is apt. Adair does not see historical fiction as a holistic combination of research and creativity, but as a mode in which the imagination competes with the real facts. Any melding of the two is the rubbing together of opposed elements. The result is chafing. The impressive volume of research that Adair has poured into the novel is not integrated into its dramatic structure, because the farcical aspects of the plot and the colourful characters are frequently crushed by the weight of the real, and vice versa.

From the New Issue

You May Also Like

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.