Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%
  • Events
  • Book reviews
  • Arts criticism
  • Prizes & Fellowships

Sign Up For Our Newsletters

Book of the Week

A Philosophy of Shame: A revolutionary emotion
Philosophy

A Philosophy of Shame: A revolutionary emotion by Frédéric Gros, translated from French by Andy Bliss

In an 1843 letter composed on a barge in Holland, a young Karl Marx wrote of a ‘national shame’ that made him want to hide his face. He anticipated his addressee, his friend Arnold Ruge, would remind him that ‘no revolution is made out of shame’. But Marx disagreed. ‘Shame’, he insisted, ‘is already a revolution of a kind’. It is from Marx that Frédéric Gros takes the subtitle of A Philosophy of Shame: A revolutionary emotion. Although we never really discover what kind of revolution Gros has in mind, the book can best be seen as an attempt to revolutionise how we think about shame itself.

From the Archive

Sense and Nonsense in Australian History
Australian History

Sense and Nonsense in Australian History by John Hirst

John Hirst is a throwback. I don’t mean in his political views, but in his sense of his duty as an historian. He belongs to a tradition which, in this country, goes back to the 1870s and 1880s, when the Australian colonies began to feel the influence of German ideas about the right relationship between the humanities and the state. Today it is a tradition increasingly hard to maintain. Under this rubric, both historians and public servants are meant to offer critical and constructive argument about present events and the destiny of the nation. Henry Parkes was an historian of sorts, and he was happy to spend government money on the underpinnings of historical scholarship in Australia. The Historical Records of New South Wales was one obvious result, and that effort, in itself, involved close cooperation between bureaucrats and scholars. Alfred Deakin was likewise a man of considerable scholarship (and more sophisticated than Parkes), whose reading shaped his ideas about national destiny, and who nourished a similar outlook at the bureaucratic level.