Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%

Soul shifts

Reflections on Richard Flanagan’s Question 7
by
December 2023, no. 460

Soul shifts

Reflections on Richard Flanagan’s Question 7
by
December 2023, no. 460

Thirty years ago, wanting to probe deeper into the question of what it meant to make home in Tasmania, I enrolled to do my honours year at the University of Tasmania. During a discussion with the secretary of the History Department about my partially formed dissertation ideas, she urged me to read a thesis by a recent graduate whose work had greatly impressed her: one Richard Flanagan. When I read the thesis and the book that came out of it, the result can best be described as a soul shift. It was not so much the information I gained but that Flanagan’s approach to Tasmania’s past released an imaginative flow in my own research, allowing it to slowly metamorphose over fifteen years into my first book, Van Diemen’s Land. I share this anecdote, not just to highlight what was lost when universities sacked most of their administrative staff, but to show how seriously Richard Flanagan has always taken history.

Flanagan never seems to mention his early historical writings (I particularly recommend Parish-Fed Bastards [1991], a powerful treatise on the treatment of the unemployed in Britain during the Depression). Apart from humility, I am not sure why this is so, but assume that Flanagan became increasingly conscious of the limits of the forgone genre, in terms of what he needed to say about how genocide, slavery, love, and belonging resonated across generations in his island home and connected to the vast tapestry of human existence beyond required literary licence, perhaps even a drowning man, to begin to be told. So the past became fiction in many of Flanagan’s formidable tomes, but in doing so never ceased to be history.

From the New Issue

Comment (1)

  • This long-hand and somewhat cranky response to Catriona Menzies-Pike’s review represents a significant indulgence on the part of this journal. It reminds me too of the rarity of negative reviews in this publication.
    Posted by Patrick Hockey
    02 December 2023

Leave a comment

If you are an ABR subscriber, you will need to sign in to post a comment.

If you have forgotten your sign in details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to ABR Comments. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.

Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.