Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%
Print this page

James Bennett reviews 'Normality: A critical genealogy' by Peter Cryle and Elizabeth Stephens

by
May 2018, no. 401

James Bennett reviews 'Normality: A critical genealogy' by Peter Cryle and Elizabeth Stephens

by
May 2018, no. 401

The word ‘normal’ and its derivatives permeate our language, but what exactly does the term mean? It is entrenched in contemporary medical discourse (normal blood pressure, normal heart rate, normal body temperature, normal blood sugar levels), shows up in statistics (normal distribution curve), in geometry (normal lines) and even in chemistry as a measurement term. There were once even normal schools – teacher training colleges – originating from the French tradition of the école normale. These definitions of the term (essentially medical or mathematical) are a long way from popular contemporary usage – a vague and highly contested concept that often rests on the notion of mental and emotional order in the individual. A critical genealogy of the normal over time also involves a close analysis of a range of cognate terms including ‘average’, ‘typical’, ‘regular’, ‘standard’, and ‘ideal’ in all their ambiguity, contestability, and even incompatibility.

James Bennett reviews 'Normality: A critical genealogy' by Peter Cryle and Elizabeth Stephens

You May Also Like