Australia’s troubling stance prior to World War II

Australia and Appeasement: Imperial Foreign Policy and the Origins of World War II

by Christopher Waters

I.B. Tauris (Palgrave Macmillan), $39.95 hb, 320 pp, 9781848859982

For long after World War II, particular opprobrium was reserved for the statesmen who failed to resist the belligerent dictators. Their failure was denounced in the popular tract Guilty Men, which appeared in 1940 soon after Hitler overran Western Europe, leaving Britain to fight on alone. These guilty men included the prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, who was forced to resign, the mandarins of the Foreign Office, and the leaders of public opinion who had supported the Conservative government in its efforts to avert war. They had refused to recognise the clear evidence that Germany, Italy, and Japan were implacably aggressive, repeatedly accepted worthless assurances that each act of aggression was the last, delayed rearmament, undermined arrangements for collective security, and allowed small nations to be dismembered. They were guilty of appeasement.

Read the rest of this article by purchasing a subscription to ABR Online, or subscribe to the print edition to receive access to ABR Online free of charge.

If you are a single issue subscriber you will need to upgrade your subscription to view back issues.

If you are already subscribed, click here to log in.

Published in March 2012 no. 339
Stuart Macintyre

Stuart Macintyre

Stuart Macintyre is the Ernest Scott Professor of History at the University of Melbourne. He is a co-editor of The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 4, 1800–1945, which is to appear later this year, and is currently working on a history of postwar reconstruction.