In the afterword to The Ghost of Waterloo, Robin Adair reveals what attracts him to writing historical fiction: ‘This has been a work of what I call “friction” – facts and real people rubbing along with plausible “what-ifs”.’ The term is apt. Adair does not see historical fiction as a holistic combination of research and creativity, but as a mode in which the imagination competes with the real facts. Any melding of the two is the rubbing together of opposed elements. The result is chafing. The impressive volume of research that Adair has poured into the novel is not integrated into its dramatic structure, because the farcical aspects of the plot and the colourful characters are frequently crushed by the weight of the real, and vice versa.
Kate McFadyen reviews 'The Ghost of Waterloo' by Robin Adair
The Ghost of Waterloo
by Robin Adair
Michael Joseph, $29.95 pb, 338 pp, 9781921518485
If you are a single issue subscriber you will need to upgrade your subscription to view back issues.If you are already subscribed, click here to log in.
Kate McFadyen lives in Melbourne where she works as a bookseller. She has been a contributor to Australian Book Review since 2007.
By this contributor
Leave a comment
Please note that all comments must be approved by ABR and comply with our Terms & Conditions.
NB: If you are an ABR Online subscriber or contributor, you will need to login to ABR Online in order to post a comment. If you have forgotten your login details, or if you receive an error message when trying to submit your comment, please email your comment (and the name of the article to which it relates) to firstname.lastname@example.org. We will review your comment and, subject to approval, we will post it under your name.